Choosing your architecture

Always On architectures reflect EDB’s recommended practices and help you to achieve the highest possible service availability in multiple configurations. These configurations range from single-location architectures to complex distributed systems that protect from hardware failures and data center failures. The architectures leverage EDB Postgres Distributed’s multi-master capability and its ability to achieve 99.999% availability, even during maintenance operations.

You can use EDB Postgres Distributed for architectures beyond the examples described here. Use-case-specific variations have been successfully deployed in production. However, these variations must undergo rigorous architecture review first. Also, EDB’s standard deployment tool for Always On architectures, TPAExec, must be enabled to support the variations before they can be supported in production environments.

Standard EDB Always On architectures

EDB has identified four standard Always On architectures:

zone [AZ])

quickly restore failover capability and a backup in a disaster recovery (DR) location

hardware in a hot standby mode

All Always On architectures protect a progressively robust range of failure situations. For example, Always On Bronze protects against local hardware failure but doesn’t provide protection from location (data center or AZ) failure. Always On Silver makes sure that a backup is kept at a different location, thus providing some protection in case of the catastrophic loss of a location. However, the database still must be restored from backup first, which might violate recovery time objective (RTO) requirements. Always On Gold provides two active locations connected in a multi-master mesh network, making sure that service remains available even in case a location goes offline. Finally, Always On Platinum adds redundant hot standby hardware in both locations to maintain local high availability in case of a hardware failure.

Each architecture can provide zero recovery point objective (RPO), as data can be streamed synchronously to at least one local master, thus guaranteeing zero data loss in case of local hardware failure.

Increasing the availability guarantee drives additional cost for hardware and licenses, networking requirements, and operational complexity. Carefully consider your availability and compliance requirements before choosing an architecture.

Architecture details

EDB Postgres Distributed uses a Monitoring Raft Consensus -based consensus architecture. While regular database operations (insert, select, delete) don’t require cluster-wide consensus, EDB Postgres Distributed benefits from an odd number of BDR nodes to make decisions that require consensus, such as generating new global sequences, or distributed DDL operations. Even the simpler architectures always have three BDR nodes, even if not all of them are storing data. Always On Gold and Platinum, which use two active locations, introduce a fifth BDR node as a witness node to support the RAFT requirements.

Applications connect to the standard Always On architectures by way of multi-host connection strings, where each HA-proxy server is a distinct entry in the multi-host connection string. Other connection mechanisms have been successfully deployed in production, but they’re not part of the standard Always On architectures.

Choosing your architecture

All architecures provide the following:* Hardware failure protection* Zero downtime upgrades* Support for availability zones in public/private cloud

Use these criteria to help you to select the appropriate Always On architecture.

Bronze

Silver

Gold

Platinum

Location failure protection

No (unless Barman is moved offsite)

Yes - Recovery from backup

Yes - instant failover to fully functional site

Yes - instant failover to fully functional site

Failover to DR or full DC

DR (if Barman is located offsite); NA otherwise

DR (if Barman is located offsite)

Full DC

Full DC

Fast local restoration of high availability after device failure

No; time to restore HA: (1) VM prov + (2) approx 60 min/500GB

Yes; three local data nodes allow to maintain HA after device failure

No; time to restore HA: (1) VM prov + (2) approx 60 min/500GB

Yes; logical standbys can quickly be promoted to master data nodes

Cross data center network traffic

Backup traffic only (if Barman is located offsite); none otherwise

Backup traffic only (if Barman is located offsite); none otherwise

Full replication traffic

Full replication traffic

License cost

2 data nodes

3 data nodes

4 data nodes

4 data nodes <br/>2 logical standbys