Origin groups#
Rules for commit scopes can depend on the node the transaction is committed on, that is, the node that acts as the origin for the transaction. The bottom group of the group tree to which that node belongs is the transaction’s origin group. To make this transparent for the application, PGD allows a commit scope to define different rules depending on the transaction’s origin group.
For example, consider an EDB Postgres Distributed cluster with nodes
spread across two data centers: a left (left_dc ) and a right one
(right_dc ). Assume the top-level PGD node group is called
top_group . You can use the following commands to set up subgroups
and create a commit scope requiring all nodes in the local data center
to confirm the transaction but only one node from the remote one:
- - create sub-groups
SELECT bdr.create_node_group(
node_group_name := left_dc,
parent_group_name := top_group,
join_node_group := false
);
SELECT bdr.create_node_group(
node_group_name := right_dc,
parent_group_name := top_group,
join_node_group := false
);
- - create a commit scope with individual rules
- - for each sub-group
SELECT bdr.add_commit_scope(
commit_scope_name := example_scope,
origin_node_group := left_dc,
rule := ALL (left_dc) GROUP COMMIT (commit_decision=raft) AND ANY 1 (right_dc) GROUP COMMIT,
wait_for_ready := true
);
SELECT bdr.add_commit_scope(
commit_scope_name := example_scope,
origin_node_group := right_dc,
rule := ANY 1 (left_dc) GROUP COMMIT AND ALL (right_dc) GROUP COMMIT (commit_decision=raft),
wait_for_ready := true
);
Now, using the example_scope on any node that’s part of left_dc
uses the first scope. Using the same scope on a node that’s part of
right_dc uses the second scope. By combining the left_dc and
right_dc origin rules under one commit scope name, an application
can simply use example_scope on either data center and get the
appropriate behavior for that data center.
Each group can also have a default commit scope specified using the
bdr.alter_node_group_option admin interface.
Making the above scopes the default ones for all transactions originating on nodes in those groups looks like this:
SELECT bdr.alter_node_group_option(
node_group_name := left_dc,
config_key := default_commit_scope,
config_value := example_scope
);
SELECT bdr.alter_node_group_option(
node_group_name := right_dc,
config_key := default_commit_scope,
config_value := example_scope
);
ORIGIN_GROUP#
You can also refer to the origin group of a transaction dynamically when
creating a commit scope rule by using ORIGIN_GROUP .
This can make certain commit scopes rules like those above in
example_scope , even easier to specify in that you can simply
specify one rule instead of two.
For example, again suppose that for transactions originating from nodes
in right_dc you want all nodes in right_dc to confirm and any 1
from left_dc to confirm before the transaction is committed. Also,
again suppose that for transactions originating in left_dc you want
all nodes in left_dc and any 1 in right_dc to confirm before the
transaction is commited. Above we used these two rules for this when
defining example_scope :
SELECT bdr.add_commit_scope(
commit_scope_name := example_scope,
origin_node_group := left_dc,
rule := ALL (left_dc) GROUP COMMIT (commit_decision=raft) AND ANY 1 (right_dc) GROUP COMMIT,
wait_for_ready := true
);
SELECT bdr.add_commit_scope(
commit_scope_name := example_scope,
origin_node_group := right_dc,
rule := ANY 1 (left_dc) GROUP COMMIT AND ALL (right_dc) GROUP COMMIT (commit_decision=raft),
wait_for_ready := true
);
However, with ORIGIN_GROUP , just adding and using the following
single-rule commit scope, example_scope_2 , will have the same
effect as the two individual rules we used above in example_scope :
SELECT bdr.add_commit_scope(
commit_scope_name := example_scope_2,
origin_node_group := top_group,
rule := ALL ORIGIN_GROUP GROUP COMMIT (commit_decision=raft) AND ANY 1 NOT ORIGIN_GROUP GROUP COMMIT;
wait_for_ready := true
);
Under example_scope_2 , when a transaction originates from
left_dc , ORIGIN_GROUP maps to left_dc and
NOT ORIGIN_GROUP maps to right_dc . Likewise, when a transaction
originates from right_dc , ORIGIN_GROUP maps to right_dc and
NOT ORIGIN_GROUP maps to left_dc . So by only specifying one
rule, you get the effect of two.
Note that if you added more subgroups, for instance a third child of
top_group , middle_dc , then according to example_scope_2
above, for transactions originating from left_dc , all the nodes in
left_dc must plus any 1 in right_dc and any 1 in middle_dc
must confirm before the transaction is committed. Of course then for
transactions originating in right_dc all the nodes in right_dc
plus any 1 node in left_dc and any 1 node in middle_dc must
confirm before the transaction is committed. Lastly, because
middle_dc is a child of top_group , example_scope_2 also
means that for transactions originating in middle_dc , all the nodes
in middle_dc plus any 1 node in left_dc and any 1 node in
right_dc must confirm before the transaction is committed.